Governance Excellence Series · Article 118

Industrial Manslaughter: The Liability Your D&O Policy Is Legally Barred From Covering

Several states prohibit insuring against this penalty entirely. This gap exists by legal design, not policy limitation

Governance Risk & Operations · 30 November 2027

Every Australian work health and safety jurisdiction now has an industrial manslaughter offence in force, a mature and serious extension of the WHS due diligence discipline discussed earlier in this series. A board's understanding of this specific offence needs to connect directly to the D&O insurance discussion also covered earlier, because one of this offence's most important features is a limitation D&O insurance can never overcome.

The Genuine, Severe Penalties Now In Force Nationally

Industrial manslaughter is a criminal offence, applying where a person conducting a business or undertaking, or an officer of that PCBU, causes a worker's death through gross negligence or recklessness in breaching a work health and safety duty. Penalties are severe, with maximum fines reaching well into the tens of millions of dollars for the organisation and lengthy imprisonment, in some jurisdictions decades, for individuals found personally responsible. Real convictions have already been recorded across multiple states since these offences began commencing, with penalties on appeal rising rather than settling.

The Critical Limit On D&O Insurance This Series Has Not Yet Covered

Several states, including Queensland, Victoria, Western Australia, and New South Wales, specifically prohibit an organisation from purchasing insurance to indemnify a person against penalties for industrial manslaughter. This connects directly and critically to the D&O insurance discussion earlier in this series: no matter how comprehensive your association's policy is, and regardless of what its insured-versus-insured or other exclusions do or do not cover, this specific liability sits entirely outside what insurance can lawfully protect against in these jurisdictions. This is not a gap in a particular policy. It is a gap the law itself has deliberately built to ensure personal accountability cannot be transferred away through insurance at all. A board reviewing its D&O coverage and concluding the organisation is well protected has not, and cannot, extend that protection to industrial manslaughter penalties in the jurisdictions that prohibit insuring against them. This liability is designed to remain personal, whatever coverage otherwise exists.

A Genuinely Important, Sophisticated Legal Point Worth Understanding

Corporate criminal negligence under this offence can be established through the collective failure of multiple people and systems working together, even where no single individual's conduct alone would be considered negligent. An association cannot defend itself by pointing to the fact that no one person did anything obviously wrong, if the combined effect of several smaller failures, in training, supervision, equipment maintenance, or risk assessment, together produced the fatal outcome. This reinforces why the systemic, organisation-wide WHS due diligence discipline this series has already established matters more than any single individual's compliance.

Industrial manslaughter law exists specifically to ensure that a worker's death arising from organisational failure carries personal, criminal consequence that cannot simply be insured away. Understanding this precisely, and building the systemic safety discipline this series has already recommended, is the only protection available where insurance is deliberately prevented from reaching.

This is one of the practical governance topics built into our Board Director course — alongside the papers, tools and frameworks that turn the principle into your board's actual practice. Explore the course →

— Annie

← Back to the Governance Excellence Series