Governance Excellence Series · Article 89

Secondment Governance: The Three-Way Relationship a Handshake Can't Cover

Both organisations carry a WHS duty during a secondment. An informal arrangement leaves both unclear which

People, Culture & Employment Governance · 11 May 2027

A staff secondment, lending an employee to a partner organisation, a government body, or an affiliated association for a defined period, is a valuable arrangement that associations increasingly use. Handled through a handshake and a few emails rather than a written agreement, it is also a specific, well-documented source of legal risk that leaves the seconded employee vulnerable and both organisations exposed.

Why A Secondment Is Genuinely A Three-Way Arrangement

A secondment creates a relationship involving three parties, the employee, the home organisation that remains their legal employer, and the host organisation directing their day-to-day work, and each of these relationships needs its own clear terms. The most common practical arrangement keeps the home organisation responsible for tracking and paying the employee's salary, superannuation, and leave entitlements, and for maintaining workers' compensation coverage, even while the host organisation directs the actual work being performed. This split is a sensible default, but it needs to be explicitly agreed in writing rather than assumed, since either party could reasonably interpret an informal arrangement differently once a dispute or incident actually arises.

The Dual Whs Duty Most Informal Secondments Overlook

Both the home and host organisations carry work health and safety duties during a secondment, connecting directly to the multi-employer consultation and coordination obligation this series discussed earlier in the WHS context. The host organisation typically controls the actual workplace, induction, and day-to-day supervision, while the home organisation retains an ongoing duty of its own. A secondment agreement should specify which party handles induction, hazard reporting, and incident response, rather than leaving both organisations to assume the other one has it covered. An informal secondment arrangement does not remove either organisation's WHS obligations. It simply leaves both of them unclear about which party is meeting the duty each of them still carries.

The Guaranteed Return Position Most Arrangements Never Specify

A specific, practical protection worth building into every secondment from the outset is a clearly defined return position, what role, and on what terms, the employee returns to once the secondment period ends. Leaving this vague creates genuine uncertainty and risk for the employee specifically, and a well-drafted secondment agreement gives the home organisation a clean, agreed mechanism for the arrangement to end without the ambiguity an informal understanding leaves behind.

A secondment agreement is not bureaucratic caution getting in the way of a valuable professional development opportunity. It is what actually protects the employee, and both organisations, from exactly the ambiguity that turns a well-intentioned arrangement into a dispute once something inevitably does not go entirely as planned.

This is one of the practical governance topics built into our Board Director course — alongside the papers, tools and frameworks that turn the principle into your board's actual practice. Explore the course →

— Annie

← Back to the Governance Excellence Series