Governance Excellence Series · Article 97

Climate and ESG: You're Likely Exempt. Your Sponsors Might Still Ask

ACNC-registered charities are explicitly exempt from mandatory climate disclosure. Indirect exposure is a different question

Strategic & External Environment · 6 July 2027

Australia's new mandatory climate-related financial disclosure regime has generated genuine anxiety across the business community, and it deserves a direct, reassuring answer for most associations reading this: charities registered with the ACNC are explicitly exempt from this regime entirely, regardless of the organisation's actual size.

The Direct, Verified Exemption Most Associations Already Have

The mandatory climate disclosure regime, now written into the Corporations Act, applies to entities required to prepare annual financial reports under Chapter 2M that also meet specific size thresholds, phased in across three groups based on revenue, assets, and employee numbers. Charities registered with the ACNC are explicitly named among the entities exempted from this regime entirely, a specific carve-out confirmed directly in the regulatory guidance surrounding the new laws. Most associations, being ACNC-registered charities, do not need to prepare for becoming a mandatory climate reporting entity themselves under this specific regime, regardless of how large the organisation's own operations eventually grow.

The Genuine Indirect Exposure Worth Being Prepared For Anyway

Direct exemption from the mandatory regime does not mean complete isolation from its effects. The regulator has directly cautioned that businesses outside the mandatory reporting requirements may still be affected indirectly, since entities that are captured by the regime may request sustainability and emissions data from the smaller organisations, suppliers, and partners they work with, as part of meeting their own value-chain reporting obligations. An association with a major corporate sponsor, or one that supplies services to a large, ASIC-reporting organisation, may be asked for basic sustainability information as part of that larger partner's own compliance process, even though the association itself carries no direct legal obligation to report anything. Being legally exempt from mandatory climate disclosure and being unaffected by it are two different things. A major sponsor's own reporting obligations can reach into an association's operations indirectly, through a straightforward request for information rather than a legal requirement.

A Genuinely Evolving Regulatory Space Worth Monitoring

The specific thresholds and scope of this regime continue to shift, with recent government proposals to raise entry thresholds further and adjust assurance requirements, meaning the regime's precise edges remain a moving target even as its core structure holds. This is worth monitoring generally rather than acting on urgently, given the current, explicit charity exemption most associations already benefit from.

Most associations can set aside anxiety about becoming a mandatory climate reporting entity themselves. The more useful governance discipline is understanding the indirect way this regime may still reach an association through its largest sponsors and partners, and being ready to respond to that request when it comes, rather than being caught unprepared by a question the association assumed did not apply to it at all.

This is one of the practical governance topics built into our Association CEO course — alongside the papers, tools and frameworks that turn the principle into your board's actual practice. Explore the course →

— Annie

← Back to the Governance Excellence Series